service · delivery

Technical Due Diligence

Lender-grade and investor-grade technical due diligence on renewable energy assets. Acquisition, refinancing, portfolio transactions, and underwriting support for the parties carrying the financial risk.
Delivery service
An operational service alongside our independent consultancy offering. Different commercial relationship, different risk profile, engaged independently.
what this service is

A signed report, delivered on a transaction timetable.

When a lender extends credit against a renewable energy asset, or an investor acquires a portfolio, or a fund underwrites a refinancing, someone has to verify that the asset is what the seller says it is. That verification is technical due diligence. It is read by credit committees, used to size loans, and referenced in transaction documentation. The signature on the report matters.
TDD sits in Arc's delivery line because it is a discrete deliverable produced to a transaction timetable. Arc accepts the mandate, runs the work, and delivers a signed report by the date required. The work itself is independent of the developer being acquired from, the contractor that built the asset, and any party with a financial interest in the transaction proceeding.
what we deliver

What we deliver.

Six workstreams across a typical TDD mandate, scoped to the transaction.
01

Design & specification review

Independent review of the as-built design against the original specification and current industry standards. Errors, under-specifications, and degradation risks identified.
02

Performance verification

Operational performance reviewed against modelled yield. Performance ratio, availability, and degradation trends benchmarked against industry expectations.
03

Grid & planning review

Connection agreement, G99 or G100 evidence, planning permission, and ongoing compliance position reviewed. Any conditions or risks identified for the credit committee.
04

Contracts & warranties

EPC contract, O&M contract, equipment warranties, and any PPA or offtake arrangement reviewed for risk, transferability, and any conditions affecting the transaction.
05

Forward forecasting

Generation forecasts, opex projections, and lifecycle capex requirements modelled over the financing or holding period.
06

Red flag & condition report

Issues categorised by severity. Conditions precedent identified. Recommendations for representation, warranty, or indemnity packaged for the legal team.
why arc delivery

The professional framework lenders require.

The professional framework lenders require.
RICS regulation is often a procurement prerequisite for TDD commissioned by institutional lenders. Arc is RICS-regulated and the work is performed within that professional standards framework.
Arc has no commercial relationship with any contractor, developer, or equipment supplier on the asset under review. Where Arc has previously delivered or maintained the asset under one of our other services, that relationship is declared and another adviser is recommended; we do not provide TDD on our own delivery work.
ISO 9001 certification means the TDD process itself is documented and audited. The deliverable is consistent, repeatable, and defensible if subsequently challenged.

Why a Renewable Energy Asset Needs Independent Technical Scrutiny Before a Deal Closes

A renewable energy asset seems simple on paper: a capacity figure, a guarantee, an O&M contract. What the paperwork doesn't reveal is whether that asset ever operated to the capacity figure, whether that O&M arrangement was effective, or whether targeted maintenance had slipped into a baseline that the seller would prefer to keep concealed. Arc Renewables provides renewable energy technical due diligence UK lenders and investors can have confidence in answering those questions before a lender puts debt in play or an investor puts equity in play, not after, when the options have usually narrowed to the costly and combative. The same goes for technical due diligence on wind energy from those investors inspecting a wind farm operation, as it does for solar portfolios.

Reviewing Technical Performance Against What Was Originally Promised

All renewables assets are sold against a modelled performance projection. When Arc Renewables performs solar technical due diligence on a purchased project, the question being asked is whether the project performed as modelled, not whether it is just producing. It includes the following:

  • Comparison of actual generation data against the original modelled projection
  • Identification of any systematic underperformance and its likely cause
  • Assessment of whether degradation is tracking within expected limits for the asset's age and technology

This can be at the heart of any comprehensive PV due diligence process given that performance validation is often the most impactful determination relating to valuation.

Assessing the Existing O&M Arrangement and Contractor Performance

The future performance of any asset is greatly influenced by how good its existing maintenance arrangement is, which is not always apparent externally until someone has gone through the contract and the contractor's previous work. Arc Renewables' solar maintenance due diligence UK work includes:

  • Examination of current O&M contract provisions like response periods and SLA commitments
  • Performance history of the contractor assigned to the asset
  • Identification of any gap between the O&M contract terms and what was actually delivered

Identifying Deferred Maintenance and Latent Defects Before They Affect Valuation

Deferred maintenance seldom appears in a seller's pack, as there's often little motivation for a vendor to freely admit its existence. Instead, Arc Renewables' solar asset condition assessment UK seeks it out, which entails:

  • Physical and documentary review of deferred maintenance on key components
  • Detection of latent defects which may impact future performance or asset life
  • A tangible measurement of what any deferred maintenance/defects identified would cost to remedy and be calculated into the price of the transaction.

Many of the overall test findings that impact the final negotiated price will be centred around this phase of a full-scale TDD solar farm review.

Verifying Grid Connection and Planning Compliance Against Actual Requirements

A grid connection agreement or planning permission that appeared fine during construction can gradually become unfit for purpose over time. Arc Renewables records such work as may be equivalent to an IE report for the solar lender, with:

  • Verification that the asset's grid connection terms match its current operating profile
  • Review of planning compliance against the conditions specified in the original permission
  • Any risk that planning or connection terms may limit future earning capacity or value of an asset.
frequently asked

Questions clients ask before engaging.

Project finance lenders, infrastructure debt funds, equity investors acquiring assets or portfolios, and asset owners refinancing or preparing for disposal. Where the buy-side and sell-side both need TDD, Arc takes one mandate, not both.
Because TDD is a discrete deliverable to a transaction timetable, not an ongoing consultancy relationship. The work itself is professional and independent (and RICS-regulated), but the commercial relationship is structured as a defined-scope mandate with a signed report at the end. That is delivery-product shape, not consultancy-engagement shape.
Two to six weeks depending on asset scale and data room quality. Single-site TDD can complete inside two weeks if the data room is well prepared. Portfolio TDD on multiple sites takes longer.
Standard practice is to issue a draft for factual review by the asset owner and seller before final issue. Comments are considered against evidence; findings are not negotiated.
Yes. TDD is regularly addressed to a syndicate of lenders, a lead arranger plus co-lenders, or to both equity and debt parties on a single transaction. The reliance package is set in the engagement letter.
Worth getting an independent perspective, no matter how complete you think the vendor's paperwork looks. There is understandably little upside for a vendor in disclosing deferred maintenance or poor conditions so an independent check is your only chance of finding out what actually exists before you commit your capital.
It's determined by the size and scope of the asset, but the review is scoped and scheduled against your go to market deadline from the outset, instead of an independent timeline.
Not at all. That's simply routine until you have something substantial to sink costs into, regardless of whether there's anything there. A clean result is still a perfectly acceptable result; it still allows you to proceed confidently.
Yes. That kind of thing is explicitly reported so it can directly inform price/term negotiations with the seller, not end up as a technical appendix no one reads.
Yes. These independent reviews are similar for both wind and solar. The technical checks are different, of course, but the intention is the same: to provide you with a truthful briefing before you proceed.
insights

Related Insights

Independent Renewable Energy Consultancy
Blog
October 23, 2026

Independent Renewable Energy Consultancy

insight
Market Commentary
June 11, 2026

DNO connection times and what they mean for project finance risk

Commercial Solar & Renewable Energy Solutions for Businesses
Net Zero
July 14, 2026

Commercial Solar & Renewable Energy Solutions for Businesses

get in touch

Get in touch with our team.

A fifteen-minute call is enough to understand your asset, your objective, and your decision context and to tell you whether Arc can add value in your situation.
Regulated and accredited
  • RICS
  • ISO 9001
  • ISO 14001
  • CHAS
  • NAPIT
  • MCS
© 2026 Arc Renewables Ltd · Company No. 12418354 · Registered in England